Australia vs New Zealand: Proportion of isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin reported to
Australia
25.89
in 2018
New Zealand
18.02
in 2017
Australia rank
51st
New Zealand rank
52nd
Proportion of isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin reported to over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Australia currently reports 25.89 against 18.02 in New Zealand, a difference of 7.87.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 54 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.55 | 35.04 | 7.5 | Australia |
| 2010s | 30.97 | 37.58 | 6.61 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin reported to, Australia or New Zealand?
- Australia, at 25.89 against 18.02 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin reported to between Australia and New Zealand?
- 7.87, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for proportion of isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin reported to?
- Australia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin reported to WHO-GASP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.