Australia vs Peru: Proportion of isolates with resistance to azithromycin reported to
Australia
3.9
in 2020
Peru
3.1
in 2020
Australia rank
30th
Peru rank
33rd
Proportion of isolates with resistance to azithromycin reported to over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Australia currently reports 3.9 against 3.1 in Peru, a difference of 0.8.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 30th and Peru ranks 33rd of 47 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.76 | 18.64 | 12.89 | Peru |
| 2020s | 3.9 | 3.1 | 0.8 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of isolates with resistance to azithromycin reported to, Australia or Peru?
- Australia, at 3.9 against 3.1 in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of isolates with resistance to azithromycin reported to between Australia and Peru?
- 0.8, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for proportion of isolates with resistance to azithromycin reported to?
- Australia ranks 30th and Peru ranks 33rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of isolates with resistance to azithromycin reported to WHO-GASP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.