New Zealand vs Philippines: Proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance
New Zealand
0.1
in 2020
Philippines
0
in 2020
New Zealand rank
11th
Philippines rank
13th
Proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.1 against 0 in Philippines, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Philippines ahead.
New Zealand ranks 11th and Philippines ranks 13th of 52 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.3595 | 0.2294 | 0.1302 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 0.1 against 0 in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 0.1, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance?
- New Zealand ranks 11th and Philippines ranks 13th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance (DS/R) to ceftriaxone reported to WHO-GASP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.