Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Zambia: Proportion of health care facilities with no water service
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
7.54
in 2019
Zambia
9.48
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
52nd
Zambia rank
51st
Proportion of health care facilities with no water service over time
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 9.48 against 7.54 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), a difference of 1.94.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 52nd and Zambia ranks 51st of 66 groups.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of health care facilities with no water service, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 9.48 against 7.54 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of health care facilities with no water service between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Zambia?
- 1.94, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Zambia rank globally for proportion of health care facilities with no water service?
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 52nd and Zambia ranks 51st of 66 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Proportion of health care facilities with no water service (Drinking Water). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.