Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Togo: Proportion of health care facilities with limited water services
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
21.1
in 2019
Togo
26.99
in 2016
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
25th
Togo rank
26th
Proportion of health care facilities with limited water services over time
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 26.99 against 21.1 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), a difference of 5.89.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.3 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 25th and Togo ranks 26th of 60 groups.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of health care facilities with limited water services, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) or Togo?
- Togo, at 26.99 against 21.1 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) as of 2016.
- What is the difference in proportion of health care facilities with limited water services between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Togo?
- 5.89, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Togo?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2016.
- How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Togo rank globally for proportion of health care facilities with limited water services?
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 25th and Togo ranks 26th of 60 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Proportion of health care facilities with limited water services (Drinking Water). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.