Saudi Arabia vs Sri Lanka: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant
Saudi Arabia
49.5%
in 2023
Sri Lanka
48.6%
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
13th
Sri Lanka rank
14th
Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 49.5% against 48.6% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 55 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48.9% | 56.0% | 7.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 50.3% | 50.1% | 0.1% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Saudi Arabia or Sri Lanka?
- Saudi Arabia, at 49.5% against 48.6% in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.9%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka rank globally for proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.