Lebanon vs Sri Lanka: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant
Lebanon
50.0%
in 2023
Sri Lanka
48.6%
in 2023
Lebanon rank
12th
Sri Lanka rank
14th
Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time
- Lebanon
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 50.0% against 48.6% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Lebanon ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 55 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.0% | 56.0% | 31.0% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 43.7% | 50.1% | 6.4% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Lebanon or Sri Lanka?
- Lebanon, at 50.0% against 48.6% in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Lebanon and Sri Lanka?
- 1.4%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Sri Lanka rank globally for proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
- Lebanon ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.