Australia vs Tunisia: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant
Australia
15.8%
in 2023
Tunisia
14.8%
in 2023
Australia rank
35th
Tunisia rank
38th
Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant over time
- Australia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 15.8% against 14.8% in Tunisia, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 35th and Tunisia ranks 38th of 55 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.5% | 17.4% | 1.0% | Australia |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 14.4% | 1.9% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Australia or Tunisia?
- Australia, at 15.8% against 14.8% in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Australia and Tunisia?
- 1.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Tunisia rank globally for proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
- Australia ranks 35th and Tunisia ranks 38th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.