Oman vs Sri Lanka: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant
Oman
59.3%
in 2023
Sri Lanka
60.5%
in 2023
Oman rank
17th
Sri Lanka rank
16th
Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time
- Oman
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 60.5% against 59.3% in Oman, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Oman ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 58 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53.5% | 65.3% | 11.9% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 70.1% | 59.5% | 10.5% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Oman or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 60.5% against 59.3% in Oman as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Oman and Sri Lanka?
- 1.2%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Sri Lanka?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Sri Lanka rank globally for proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
- Oman ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 58 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.