Latvia vs Tunisia: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant
Latvia
22.9%
in 2023
Tunisia
26.1%
in 2023
Latvia rank
37th
Tunisia rank
34th
Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time
- Latvia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 26.1% against 22.9% in Latvia, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 37th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 58 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.2% | 32.8% | 11.6% | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 22.8% | 27.6% | 4.8% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Latvia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 26.1% against 22.9% in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Latvia and Tunisia?
- 3.2%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
- Latvia ranks 37th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 58 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.