Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant

Lao People's Democratic Republic
55.6%
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
52.3%
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
19th
Saudi Arabia rank
20th

Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Saudi Arabia
0204060201720202023

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 55.6% against 52.3% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 3.3%.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 19th and Saudi Arabia ranks 20th of 58 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2010s 46.9% 54.3% 7.4% Saudi Arabia
2020s 51.1% 54.1% 2.9% Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Saudi Arabia?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 55.6% against 52.3% in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Saudi Arabia?
3.3%, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Saudi Arabia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Saudi Arabia rank globally for proportion of bloodstream infection due to escherichia coli resistant?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 19th and Saudi Arabia ranks 20th of 58 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-third-generation/lao-pdr/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-bloodstream-infection-due-to-escherichia-coli-resistant-to-third-generation/lao-pdr/saudi-arabia/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (%)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
58 places, 386 data points, 2016–2023
Last refreshed