Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Private prepaid plans

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
36.6%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
30.9%
in 2008
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
4th

Private prepaid plans over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Zimbabwe
010203040199520032011

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 36.6% against 30.9% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5.7%.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 42.8% 26.4% 16.4% Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2000s 36.9% 29.7% 7.2% Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher private prepaid plans, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 36.6% against 30.9% in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
5.7%, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for private prepaid plans?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Private prepaid plans. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/private-prepaid-plans-percent-of-private-expenditure-on-health/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/private-prepaid-plans-percent-of-private-expenditure-on-health/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Private prepaid plans</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health)
Unit
% of private expenditure on health
Source
World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 985 data points, 1995–2011
Last refreshed

Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.