North Africa vs Zimbabwe: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- North Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 30.9% against 5.9% in North Africa, a difference of 25.0%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.3 times North Africa's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
North Africa ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.2% | 26.4% | 19.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 7.0% | 29.7% | 22.7% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, North Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 30.9% against 5.9% in North Africa as of 2008.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between North Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 25.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
- How do North Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- North Africa ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.