Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 30.9% against 19.1% in Eswatini, a difference of 11.8%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eswatini ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.4% | 26.4% | 8.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 18.8% | 29.7% | 10.9% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 30.9% against 19.1% in Eswatini as of 2008.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 11.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Eswatini ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.