Eswatini vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- Eswatini
- Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 19.1% against 4.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa, a difference of 14.7%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 4.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 6th of 53 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.4% | 3.5% | 14.9% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 18.9% | 4.7% | 14.1% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 4.3% | 14.7% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Eswatini or Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
- Eswatini, at 19.1% against 4.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Eswatini and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
- 14.7%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Eswatini ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 6th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.