Eswatini vs Namibia: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- Eswatini
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 61.1% against 19.1% in Eswatini, a difference of 42.0%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 3.2 times Eswatini's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 6th and Namibia ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.4% | 74.5% | 56.1% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 18.9% | 73.1% | 54.2% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 61.1% | 42.1% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Eswatini or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 61.1% against 19.1% in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Eswatini and Namibia?
- 42.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Eswatini ranks 6th and Namibia ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.