Congo vs Zambia: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 3.6% against 3.6% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 20th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.3% | Congo |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 2.1% | 1.1% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 3.6% | 3.6% | 0.1% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Congo or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 3.6% against 3.6% in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Congo and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Congo ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 20th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.