Chad vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health)
Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health) over time
- Chad
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.6 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 37th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 40th of 53 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Chad or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Chad, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0.0%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Chad ranks 37th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 40th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.