Cape Verde vs Congo: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- Cape Verde
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.6% against 3.1% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 23rd and Congo ranks 21st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.1% | 1.1% | 2.0% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 2.7% | 1.0% | 1.7% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 3.6% | 0.4% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Cape Verde or Congo?
- Congo, at 3.6% against 3.1% in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Cape Verde and Congo?
- 0.5%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Congo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Congo rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Cape Verde ranks 23rd and Congo ranks 21st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.