Cape Verde vs Central African Republic: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- Cape Verde
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 3.1% against 1.8% in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.8 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 23rd and Central African Republic ranks 26th of 53 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 2.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Cape Verde or Central African Republic?
- Cape Verde, at 3.1% against 1.8% in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Cape Verde and Central African Republic?
- 1.3%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Central African Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Central African Republic rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Cape Verde ranks 23rd and Central African Republic ranks 26th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.