Botswana vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Private prepaid plans

Botswana
79.9%
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
36.6%
in 2011
Botswana rank
2nd
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
1st

Private prepaid plans over time

  • Botswana
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
020406080199520032011

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 79.9% against 36.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 43.3%.

That makes Botswana's figure about 2.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.

Botswana ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 1st of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 4.0% 42.8% 38.9% Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2000s 39.6% 36.4% 3.2% Botswana
2010s 79.9% 35.6% 44.2% Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher private prepaid plans, Botswana or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Botswana, at 79.9% against 36.6% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2011.
What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Botswana and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
43.3%, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
How do Botswana and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for private prepaid plans?
Botswana ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 1st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Private prepaid plans. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/private-prepaid-plans-percent-of-private-expenditure-on-health/botswana/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/private-prepaid-plans-percent-of-private-expenditure-on-health/botswana/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Botswana vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Private prepaid plans</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health)
Unit
% of private expenditure on health
Source
World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 985 data points, 1995–2011
Last refreshed

Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.