Botswana vs South Africa: Private prepaid plans
Private prepaid plans over time
- Botswana
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 81.1% against 79.9% in Botswana, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 53 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.0% | 72.9% | 68.9% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 39.6% | 73.2% | 33.6% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 79.9% | 80.7% | 0.8% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher private prepaid plans, Botswana or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 81.1% against 79.9% in Botswana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in private prepaid plans between Botswana and South Africa?
- 1.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and South Africa rank globally for private prepaid plans?
- Botswana ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Private prepaid plans (% of private expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prepaid and risk-pooling plans are the expenditure on health by private insurance institutions. Private insurance enrolment may be contractual or voluntary, and conditions and benefits or basket of benefits are agreed on a voluntary basis between the insurance agent and the beneficiaries. They are thus not controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members.