New Zealand vs Slovenia: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time
- New Zealand
- Slovenia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 227.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 198.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Slovenia, a difference of 28.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 4th of 30 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 228.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 263.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 35 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 223.84 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 276.02 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 52.18 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, New Zealand or Slovenia?
- New Zealand, at 227.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 198.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Slovenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 28.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
- New Zealand ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 4th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences