Luxembourg vs Sweden: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time
- Luxembourg
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 200.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 193.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Luxembourg, a difference of 7.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Sweden ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 13th and Sweden ranks 11th of 30 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 218.95 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 228.9 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 9.95 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Sweden |
| 2020s | 173.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 205.65 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 32.45 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Luxembourg or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 200.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 193.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 7.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
- Luxembourg ranks 13th and Sweden ranks 11th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences