Lithuania vs Poland: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Lithuania
454.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2024
Poland
518.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Lithuania rank
2nd
Poland rank
1st

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Lithuania
  • Poland
0200400600800200320132024

How they compare

Poland currently reports 518.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 454.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Lithuania, a difference of 63.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 5 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Poland Difference Ahead
2010s 605.98 Per 100 000 inhabitants 534.84 Per 100 000 inhabitants 71.14 Per 100 000 inhabitants Lithuania
2020s 391.27 Per 100 000 inhabitants 457.38 Per 100 000 inhabitants 66.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Lithuania or Poland?
Poland, at 518.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 454.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Lithuania and Poland?
63.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Poland?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Poland rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Lithuania ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 5 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Poland: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/lithuania-2/poland-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/lithuania-2/poland-2/">Lithuania vs Poland: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences