Korea vs Poland: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Korea
75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Poland
518.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Korea rank
3rd
Poland rank
1st

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Korea
  • Poland
0200400600200320132023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 518.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Korea, a difference of 443.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

That makes Poland's figure about 6.9 times Korea's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 3 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 104.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants 560.75 Per 100 000 inhabitants 456.45 Per 100 000 inhabitants Poland
2010s 87.74 Per 100 000 inhabitants 539.31 Per 100 000 inhabitants 451.57 Per 100 000 inhabitants Poland
2020s 73 Per 100 000 inhabitants 457.38 Per 100 000 inhabitants 384.38 Per 100 000 inhabitants Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Korea or Poland?
Poland, at 518.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Korea and Poland?
443.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Poland?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Korea and Poland rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Korea ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Poland: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/korea/poland-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/korea/poland-2/">Korea vs Poland: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences