Korea vs Lithuania: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time
- Korea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 454.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Korea, a difference of 379.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 6.1 times Korea's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 3 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 85.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 605.98 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 520.48 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 73 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 391.27 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 318.27 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Korea or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 454.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Korea and Lithuania?
- 379.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Lithuania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Korea and Lithuania rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
- Korea ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 2nd of 3 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences