Iceland vs Italy: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Iceland
164.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2024
Italy
161.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Iceland rank
18th
Italy rank
19th

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Iceland
  • Italy
100150200250300350200020122024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 164.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 161.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Italy, a difference of 3.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Italy ahead.

Iceland ranks 18th and Italy ranks 19th of 30 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 140.77 Per 100 000 inhabitants 322.28 Per 100 000 inhabitants 181.51 Per 100 000 inhabitants Italy
2010s 152 Per 100 000 inhabitants 261.16 Per 100 000 inhabitants 109.16 Per 100 000 inhabitants Italy
2020s 165.88 Per 100 000 inhabitants 159.82 Per 100 000 inhabitants 6.05 Per 100 000 inhabitants Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Iceland or Italy?
Iceland, at 164.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 161.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Italy as of 2024.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Iceland and Italy?
3.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Italy?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Italy rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Iceland ranks 18th and Italy ranks 19th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Italy: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/iceland/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/iceland/italy/">Iceland vs Italy: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences