Germany vs Korea: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Germany
379.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Korea
75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Germany rank
3rd
Korea rank
3rd

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Germany
  • Korea
100200300400200520142023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 379.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Korea, a difference of 304 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

That makes Germany's figure about 5.0 times Korea's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 3rd of 30 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 382.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants 101.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants 281.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants Germany
2010s 406.74 Per 100 000 inhabitants 86.18 Per 100 000 inhabitants 320.56 Per 100 000 inhabitants Germany
2020s 370.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants 73.25 Per 100 000 inhabitants 297.15 Per 100 000 inhabitants Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Germany or Korea?
Germany, at 379.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 75.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Germany and Korea?
304 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Korea?
8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Germany and Korea rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Germany ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 3rd of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Korea: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/germany/korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/germany/korea/">Germany vs Korea: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences