Denmark vs Sweden: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Denmark
206.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2024
Sweden
200.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Denmark rank
10th
Sweden rank
11th

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Denmark
  • Sweden
0100200300400200520142024

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 206.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 200.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Sweden, a difference of 5.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 11th of 30 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 340.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants 279.93 Per 100 000 inhabitants 60.37 Per 100 000 inhabitants Denmark
2010s 317.36 Per 100 000 inhabitants 257.12 Per 100 000 inhabitants 60.24 Per 100 000 inhabitants Denmark
2020s 224.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants 205.65 Per 100 000 inhabitants 18.55 Per 100 000 inhabitants Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Denmark or Sweden?
Denmark, at 206.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 200.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Denmark and Sweden?
5.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Sweden?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Sweden rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Denmark ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 11th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Sweden: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/denmark/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/denmark/sweden/">Denmark vs Sweden: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences