Denmark vs New Zealand: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Denmark
206.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2024
New Zealand
227.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2014
Denmark rank
10th
New Zealand rank
7th

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Denmark
  • New Zealand
0100200300400200520142024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 227.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 206.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Denmark, a difference of 21.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 7th of 30 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 350.78 Per 100 000 inhabitants 224.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants 126.08 Per 100 000 inhabitants Denmark
2010s 324.04 Per 100 000 inhabitants 223.84 Per 100 000 inhabitants 100.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Denmark or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 227.2 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 206.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Denmark as of 2014.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Denmark and New Zealand?
21.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and New Zealand?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Denmark and New Zealand rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Denmark ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 7th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs New Zealand: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/denmark/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/denmark/new-zealand/">Denmark vs New Zealand: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences