Chile vs Mexico: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Chile
90.9 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Mexico
58.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Chile rank
27th
Mexico rank
29th

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
406080100120140200420132023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 90.9 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 58.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Mexico, a difference of 32.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.5 times Mexico's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 27th and Mexico ranks 29th of 30 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 119.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants 69.5 Per 100 000 inhabitants 49.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants Chile
2010s 100.95 Per 100 000 inhabitants 66.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants 34.65 Per 100 000 inhabitants Chile
2020s 85.73 Per 100 000 inhabitants 44.92 Per 100 000 inhabitants 40.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Chile or Mexico?
Chile, at 90.9 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 58.8 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Chile and Mexico?
32.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Chile ranks 27th and Mexico ranks 29th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mexico: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/chile/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/chile/mexico/">Chile vs Mexico: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences