Belgium vs Romania: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Belgium
130.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Romania
142.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2024
Belgium rank
24th
Romania rank
22nd

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Belgium
  • Romania
100200300400500200020122024

How they compare

Romania currently reports 142.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 130.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Belgium, a difference of 12.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Romania ahead.

Belgium ranks 24th and Romania ranks 22nd of 30 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Romania Difference Ahead
2010s 165.14 Per 100 000 inhabitants 321.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants 156.56 Per 100 000 inhabitants Romania
2020s 135.15 Per 100 000 inhabitants 106.9 Per 100 000 inhabitants 28.25 Per 100 000 inhabitants Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Belgium or Romania?
Romania, at 142.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 130.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Belgium as of 2024.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Belgium and Romania?
12.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Romania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Romania rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Belgium ranks 24th and Romania ranks 22nd of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Romania: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/belgium/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/belgium/romania/">Belgium vs Romania: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences