Australia vs Singapore: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission

Australia
179.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Singapore
180.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants
in 2023
Australia rank
16th
Singapore rank
15th

Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time

  • Australia
  • Singapore
0100200300200720152023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 180.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 179.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Australia, a difference of 1.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Singapore ahead.

Australia ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 15th of 30 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Singapore Difference Ahead
2010s 214.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants 217.82 Per 100 000 inhabitants 3.12 Per 100 000 inhabitants Singapore
2020s 189.35 Per 100 000 inhabitants 177.25 Per 100 000 inhabitants 12.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Australia or Singapore?
Singapore, at 180.4 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 179.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Australia and Singapore?
1.3 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Singapore?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Australia and Singapore rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
Australia ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 15th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Singapore: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/australia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/primary-care-congestive-heart-failure-hospital-admission/australia/singapore/">Australia vs Singapore: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Unit
Per 100 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
38 places, 598 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences