Australia vs Austria: Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission
Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission over time
- Australia
- Austria
How they compare
Australia currently reports 179.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 173 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Austria, a difference of 6.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Austria ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Austria ranks 17th of 30 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Austria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 214.7 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 250.62 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 35.93 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Austria |
| 2020s | 189.35 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 196 Per 100 000 inhabitants | 6.65 Per 100 000 inhabitants | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission, Australia or Austria?
- Australia, at 179.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants against 173 Per 100 000 inhabitants in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission between Australia and Austria?
- 6.1 Per 100 000 inhabitants, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Austria?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Austria rank globally for primary care — congestive heart failure hospital admission?
- Australia ranks 16th and Austria ranks 17th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Primary care — Congestive heart failure hospital admission. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary Care – Avoidable Hospital Admissions (AA) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on hospital admissions for chronic admissions that could be avoided though better management in primary care. Conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can largely be treated in primary care. Admission rates for these conditions may therefore signal quality issues in primary care. Indicators are reported as age- and sex-standardised rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods surveys on Primary Care (AA) and Hospital Data provide detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences