Marshall Islands vs Zambia: Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Marshall Islands
100.0%
in 2024
Zambia
100.0%
in 2024
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Marshall Islands
- Zambia
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.5% | 4.9% | 65.6% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 55.0% | 24.0% | 31.0% | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 78.4% | 21.6% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Marshall Islands or Zambia?
- Marshall Islands, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Marshall Islands and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Marshall Islands and Zambia rank globally for previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.