Macau, China vs Namibia: Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Macau, China
96.0%
in 2024
Namibia
95.0%
in 2024
Macau, China rank
65th
Namibia rank
66th
Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Macau, China
- Namibia
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 96.0% against 95.0% in Namibia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Macau, China ahead.
Macau, China ranks 65th and Namibia ranks 66th of 180 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 87.0% | 37.7% | 49.3% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 95.4% | 91.8% | 3.6% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Macau, China or Namibia?
- Macau, China, at 96.0% against 95.0% in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Macau, China and Namibia?
- 1.0%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Namibia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Macau, China and Namibia rank globally for previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Macau, China ranks 65th and Namibia ranks 66th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.