Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Eswatini
100.0%
in 2024
Marshall Islands
100.0%
in 2024
Eswatini rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Eswatini
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Eswatini ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.0% | 91.0% | 61.0% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 63.3% | 49.7% | 13.6% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Eswatini or Marshall Islands?
- Eswatini, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Marshall Islands rank globally for previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Eswatini ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.