Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB
Congo
100.0%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
100.0%
in 2024
Congo rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB over time
- Congo
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 87.7% | 43.3% | 44.3% | Congo |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
- Congo, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
- Congo ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.