Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
2.94
in 2022
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.67
in 2022
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
115th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
114th

Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0246199020062022

How they compare

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) currently reports 2.94 against 2.67 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.27.

That makes Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 115th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 114th of 156 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 3.36 3.63 0.2704 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 3.02 2.89 0.1342 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
2020s 2.94 2.68 0.256 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), at 2.94 against 2.67 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2022.
What is the difference in prevalence of underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5 between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.27, with Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for prevalence of underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 115th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 114th of 156 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 (Crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-underweight-among-adults-bmi-18-5-crude-estimate/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-underweight-among-adults-bmi-18-5-crude-estimate/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 (Crude estimate)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 9,955 data points, 1990–2022
Last refreshed