Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Belarus: Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
1.55
in 2022
Belarus
1.77
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) rank
154th
Belarus rank
151st
Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 over time
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.77 against 1.55 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG), a difference of 0.22.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 154th and Belarus ranks 151st of 156 groups.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5 | 2.61 | 1.11 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1.47 | 2.12 | 0.6569 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.3014 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 1.77 against 1.55 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in prevalence of underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5 between Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Belarus?
- 0.22, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Belarus?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Belarus rank globally for prevalence of underweight among adults, bmi < 18.5?
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 154th and Belarus ranks 151st of 156 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of underweight among adults, BMI < 18.5 (Crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.