Myanmar vs New Caledonia: Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)
Myanmar
4.6%
in 2024
New Caledonia
4.1%
in 2024
Myanmar rank
90th
New Caledonia rank
92nd
Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population) over time
- Myanmar
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 4.6% against 4.1% in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.9% | 8.7% | 16.2% | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 5.4% | 7.7% | 2.2% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 4.4% | 4.7% | 0.3% | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of undernourishment, Myanmar or New Caledonia?
- Myanmar, at 4.6% against 4.1% in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of undernourishment between Myanmar and New Caledonia?
- 0.5%, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and New Caledonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and New Caledonia rank globally for prevalence of undernourishment?
- Myanmar ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 92nd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Prevalence of undernourishment is the percentage of the population whose habitual food consumption is insufficient to provide the dietary energy levels that are required to maintain a normal active and healthy life. Data showing as 2.5 may signify a prevalence of undernourishment below 2.5%.