Nauru vs Tokelau: Prevalence of overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 (Crude estimate)
Nauru
88.84
in 2022
Tokelau
90.2
in 2022
Nauru rank
3rd
Tokelau rank
2nd
Prevalence of overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 (Crude estimate) over time
- Nauru
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 90.2 against 88.84 in Nauru, a difference of 1.36.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 3rd and Tokelau ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Tokelau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.45 | 84.16 | 6.28 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 89.44 | 87.07 | 2.37 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 88.97 | 88.98 | 0.01 | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 88.84 | 90.08 | 1.24 | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25, Nauru or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 90.2 against 88.84 in Nauru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in prevalence of overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25 between Nauru and Tokelau?
- 1.36, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tokelau?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
- How do Nauru and Tokelau rank globally for prevalence of overweight among adults, bmi ≥ 25?
- Nauru ranks 3rd and Tokelau ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of overweight among adults, BMI ≥ 25 (Crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.