Samoa vs South Africa: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Samoa
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 20.9% against 18.2% in Samoa, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 66th of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.9% | 17.8% | 5.1% | Samoa |
| 2020s | 19.6% | 19.9% | 0.3% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Samoa or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 20.9% against 18.2% in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Samoa and South Africa?
- 2.7%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and South Africa rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Samoa ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 66th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.