Pakistan vs Tunisia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Pakistan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 24.2% against 22.9% in Pakistan, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 64th and Tunisia ranks 62nd of 130 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.5% | 20.9% | 5.4% | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 24.2% | 26.6% | 2.4% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Pakistan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 24.2% against 22.9% in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Pakistan and Tunisia?
- 1.3%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Tunisia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Tunisia rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Pakistan ranks 64th and Tunisia ranks 62nd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.