Low income vs Malawi: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Low income
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 81.7% against 65.4% in Low income, a difference of 16.3%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Low income's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 1st and Malawi ranks 4th of 23 groups.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.4% | 79.3% | 21.8% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 63.9% | 81.8% | 17.9% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Low income or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 81.7% against 65.4% in Low income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Low income and Malawi?
- 16.3%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Malawi?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Low income and Malawi rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Low income ranks 1st and Malawi ranks 4th of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.