IDA & IBRD total vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population over time
- IDA & IBRD total
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 68.8% against 31.4% in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 37.4%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.2 times IDA & IBRD total's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 23 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA & IBRD total | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.3% | 67.0% | 40.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 32.3% | 71.5% | 39.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, IDA & IBRD total or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 68.8% against 31.4% in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between IDA & IBRD total and Zimbabwe?
- 37.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do IDA & IBRD total and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.