El Salvador vs Kiribati: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- El Salvador
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 43.9% against 41.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 35th and Kiribati ranks 33rd of 130 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43.7% | 41.0% | 2.7% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 45.8% | 42.1% | 3.7% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, El Salvador or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 43.9% against 41.7% in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between El Salvador and Kiribati?
- 2.2%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kiribati?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Kiribati rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- El Salvador ranks 35th and Kiribati ranks 33rd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.