Cape Verde vs Laos: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Cape Verde
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 34.4% against 32.1% in Cape Verde, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 46th and Laos ranks 43rd of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.1% | 29.4% | 5.7% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 33.7% | 34.4% | 0.7% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Cape Verde or Laos?
- Laos, at 34.4% against 32.1% in Cape Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Cape Verde and Laos?
- 2.3%, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Laos?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Cape Verde and Laos rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Cape Verde ranks 46th and Laos ranks 43rd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.