Bangladesh vs Uzbekistan: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Bangladesh
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 26.2% against 24.4% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 130 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.2% | 15.3% | 15.0% | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 28.4% | 25.1% | 3.3% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Bangladesh or Uzbekistan?
- Bangladesh, at 26.2% against 24.4% in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Bangladesh and Uzbekistan?
- 1.8%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uzbekistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Uzbekistan rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Bangladesh ranks 59th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.